Blog

Today, House Republicans held a hearing impacting millions of American women seeking safe and affordable coverage for basic preventive health care, including contraception, where the Republican Majority refused to allow a single witness put forward by the Democratic Members of the Committee to testify. As Ranking Member Cummings (D-MD) wrote to the Republican Chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), the “Committee commits a massive injustice by trying to pretend that the views of millions of women across this country are meaningless, worthless, or irrelevant to this debate”:

Rather than inviting witnesses on both sides of this issue to engage in a reasoned and balanced discussion, you have constructed one of the most one-sided hearings I have ever seen, stacking it only with witnesses who agree with your position.

When my staff inquired about requesting minority witnesses for this hearing, we were informed that you would allow only one. Based on your decision, we requested as our minority witness a third-year Georgetown University Law Center student named Sandra Fluke. I believed it was critical to have at least one woman at the witness table who could discuss the repercussions that denying coverage for contraceptives has on women across this country.

In response, your staff relayed that you had decided as follows:
“As the hearing is not about reproductive rights and contraception but instead about the Administration’s actions as they relate to freedom of religion and conscience, he believes that Ms. Fluke is not an appropriate witness.”

It is inconceivable to me that you believe tomorrow’s hearing has no bearing on the reproductive rights of women. This Committee commits a massive injustice by trying to pretend that the views of millions of women across this country are meaningless, worthless, or irrelevant to this debate.

Instead of inviting Ms. Fluke to testify, your staff informed us that you planned to invite a different witness who was no longer available after being informed of your decision to limit the minority to a single witness. Compounding this insult, this afternoon you added two more witnesses of your own, in violation of Committee rules requiring three days notice for witnesses called by the majority.

Even if you fundamentally disagree with Ms. Fluke’s viewpoint on this matter, you should not be afraid to hear it. A hearing stacked with last-minute witnesses who offer no competing views only contributes to the perception that our Committee is fostering a circus-like atmosphere intended to further politicize this debate.

This is Sandra Fluke, the woman who Chairman Issa thinks is “not an appropriate witness” summarizing the testimony she would have given on the impact of denying contraceptive coverage:

These are the ‘appropriate’ witnesses the Committee heard from in their first panel:

Five men

As Leader Pelosi asked at her weekly press conference today, “where are the women on that panel?”:

You are talking about birth control; you are talking about women’s health. I firmly believe, I want to remove all doubt in anyone’s mind on where I am on this subject. This is an issue about women’s health, and I believe that women’s health should be covered in all of the insurance plans that are there.

Right now, as we gather here, in another part of the Capitol there is a hearing. Five men are testifying on women’s health. My colleague, Carolyn Maloney of New York, who is on the committee, looked down at this panel from which a woman, who was the Democratic witness, was excluded and said: “where are the women?” And that’s a good question for the whole debate. Where are the women? Where are the women on that panel?

Imagine having a panel on women’s health, and they do not have any women on the panel. Duh! What is it that men don’t understand about women’s health? And how central the issue of family planning is to that? Not just if you’re having families, but if you need various kinds of prescription drugs for your general health, which was the testimony they would have heard this morning if they had allowed a woman on the panel.

I think the fact that they did not allow a woman on the panel is symbolic of the whole debate, as to who is making these decisions about women’s health, and who should be covered. And I remind you, I think it’s [28] states have this requirement already. So this is nothing really new. More than half of the states already have it.

So this is probably a pretty good debate to have. Just think. Suppose you were, suppose you were a Christian Scientist, and you had an institution, and you said, if people work here for us, who are not Christian Scientists, or even if they are, they cannot avail themselves of any medical treatments because that’s what we believe. Would that work for you? I mean, it’s just, it’s so, shall we say, disrespectful of the contribution that, in this case, women make to the workforce. Ninety-eight percent of Catholic women, I am told by all of you, [have used] birth control to determine the size and the timing of their families.

So again, it is a women’s health issue. Yes, I think that all institutions should cover and give health insurance, should cover the full range of health insurance issues for women. And I think it’s really curiouser and curiouser, that as we get further into this debate, the Republican leadership of this Congress thinks it’s appropriate to have a hearing on a subject of women’s health and purposefully exclude women from the panel.

What else do you need to know about the subject? If you need to know more, tune in. I may, I may at some point be moved to explain biology to my colleagues.

Watch statements from House Democrats at the hearing»

Posted in Affordable Health Care, Consumer Protections, Oversight, What's Happening | Leave a comment

This morning, Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan insinuated that a throng of Democrats supported the GOP plan to end the Medicare guarantee and increase costs for seniors but were “too afraid at this time to come forward“:

[Chairman Ryan] said the election needs to be one in which the GOP clearly explains to voters that it will implement ideas like Ryan’s premium support plan for Medicare…

He said more and more Democrats are open to a version of Medicare support… [The Hill, 2/16]

It’s time for Chairman Ryan to get out of the spin zone. When House Republicans voted repeatedly to end the Medicare guarantee last year, Democrats stood in strong opposition—and Democrats will continue to stand up for seniors and oppose this dangerous plan.

So while Chairman Ryan is “excited” about his plan to let Medicare wither on the vine…

Politico – Paul Ryan ‘excited’ to defend Medicare plan

…he should know Democrats—and America’s seniors—certainly aren’t.

Posted in Correcting the Record, In the News, Retirement Security | Leave a comment

Buckle your seatbelts – It’s a rough road ahead for House Republicans this week!

Faced with backlash from both sides of the aisle against their monstrosity of a transportation bill that destroys 550,000 jobs and bankrupts the Highway Trust Fund, Speaker Boehner and the Republican majority now plan to break up the legislation into three pieces.     

But that won’t stop the reviews from piling up on the Boehner Expressway:

Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood: “This is the most partisan transportation bill that I have ever seen…It’s the worst transportation bill I’ve ever seen during 35 years of public service.”

Los Angeles Times – In the House, a transportation train wreck: “…it is less a serious policy document than a wish list for oil lobbyists, and its funding proposals are so radical that they have been decried even by such conservative watchdogs as the Reason Foundation, the Competitive Enterprise Institute and Taxpayers for Common Sense.”

Transportation and Infrastructure Ranking Member Nick J. Rahall: “The Republican Leadership’s partisan signature ‘jobs’ bill is not sustainable, and would lead America’s transportation programs down a reckless path toward bankruptcy…There is no doubt we need to pass a long-term bill that creates certainty, but the only thing this bill does is make certain the Highway Trust Fund will go belly up even before the end of the bill.”

Tampa Tribune – Road bill careening to dead end: “The new transportation bill in the U.S. House is being attacked by conservatives, liberals, moderates, transit advocates, bicyclists and environmentalists, to name a few…If you’re wondering why Congress has such trouble getting anything done, follow the progress of the House’s transportation bill as it crashes and burns.”

Chicago Business – Area GOP congressmen revolt over pending transit bill: “In a flurry of statements after several days of quiet review, U.S. Reps. Robert Dold, Judy Biggert and Adam Kinzinger — all Republicans — flatly say or strongly suggest that they cannot support the bill drafted by House GOP leadership.”

Office of GOP Rep. Steve LaTourette: “In its current formation there are lots of things we don’t like about it. If it’s not changed drastically, we’re not going to support it.”

National Resources Defense Council: “The Republican leadership has the temerity to call this horrible package a jobs bill, but it’s actually a measure that will make it impossible to pass a transportation bill – the one true jobs bill Congress could pass this year.”  

Heritage Action for America CEO Michael Needham: “One of the problems you have in Washington, is you take really bad legislation, which the highway bill is, and you put a sweetener in it…That’s what’s going on here.”

Taxpayers for Common Sense – “This $260 billion bill lacks sustainable, user-based funding to pay for the nation’s transportation priorities and its costs are instead offset with budget gimmicks and speculative revenue sources.”

GOP Senator Jim Inhofe: “You can’t very well use revenues you don’t have…”

Club for Growth: “Simply put, this is a massive 846-page bill that doesn’t cut any spending at all…”

New York Times – A Terrible Transportation Bill: “The list of outrages coming out of the House is long, but the way the Republicans are trying to hijack the $260 billion transportation bill defies belief.”

Streetsblog – House Transpo Bill Turns Communities Into Collateral Damage: “This proposal takes sound transportation policy, covers it with oil, sets it on fire, and then dances on the ashes.”

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel – House Transportation Bill Doesn’t Deserve Passage: A transportation bill in the House is moving forward despite waves of criticism from both left and right…there are too many things wrong with this bill to approve it as is. It should be scrapped.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid: “[Republicans] have a bill that’s a love note to the tea party.”

Newsday – Keep up support for transit: “Despite decades of consistent, reliable federal support for mass transit, the Republican majority in the House of Representatives is trying to pass a transportation bill that would break that commitment. That would be catastrophic for our region…”

Amalgamated Transit Union International: "The House once again walked away from the prospect of preserving urban mobility…”

The Sacramento Bee – U.S. House throws transit under a bus: “If [House Republicans] have their way, the nation’s transportation network will take a giant step backward to a ‘roads only’ policy for dedicated funding…Americans should urge their members of Congress to reject it.” 

Detroit Free Press – Renew the transportation bill, then start the hard work to improve it: “…as bad as the inept inaction of Congress has been, a new House Republican plan that would remove mass transit money from the shelter of the Highway Trust Fund is even worse.”

Posted in In the News, Labor and American Jobs, The Environment, What's Happening | Leave a comment

Two years ago, the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC overturned a century of common-sense campaign finance laws and opened the floodgates to unrestricted special interest campaign donations in American elections—permitting corporations to spend unlimited funds (directly or through third parties and Political Action Committees organized for those purposes) to influence Federal elections. It also opened the door for the emergence of Super PACs. In the last two years, Super PACs have raised about $181 million with roughly half of it coming from fewer than 200 people and roughly 20% from corporations. As Leader Pelosi explains, we must stop Stephen Colbert:

Under Democratic-control last Congress, the House passed the DISCLOSE Act by a vote of 219-206 to close some of the biggest election loopholes created by the Citizens United case—but Senate Republicans blocked its progress. House Democrats are continuing the fight for disclosure to get unlimited, secret donations out of politics and today introduced DISCLOSE 2012 (H.R. 4010) which will:

Require public reporting by corporations, unions, Super PACs and other outside groups to the Federal Election Commission within 24 hours of making a campaign expenditure or transferring funds to other groups for campaign-related activity (of $10,000 or more).

Require corporations and other outside groups to stand by their campaign ads—with their leader and top financial contributors disclosed in the ads.

Require corporations and other outside groups to disclose campaign-related spending to shareholders and organization members.

Require lobbyists to disclose campaign-related expenditures in conjunction with their lobbying activities.

Read the full bill»

As Leader Pelosi has said, this is about the core values of our democracy: that the votes of the American people determine the outcome of our elections, not the bankroll of the privileged few. DISCLOSE 2012 is the first step to restoring fairness in our political system. Learn more about the legislation and efforts to ‘DISCLOSE, Reform, & Amend’ at facebook.com/StopColbert»

Posted in Civil Rights, Oversight, What's Happening | Leave a comment

Today, Leader Cantor posted a “fact” sheet on the STOCK Act–for accuracy’s sake, see notations in red:

How House Republicans are Strengthening the Senate STOCK Act (Really??)

Specifically prohibit Executive and Legislative Branch officials from gaining preferential access to initial public offerings (True)

Definitively extend the new transaction reporting requirements to all Executive Branch officials who are required to file annual financial disclosures (False, in Senate bill)

Extend the proposed Legislative Branch public disclosure requirements (including making all financial disclosures available online by September 1, 2012) to the Executive Branch (False, in Senate bill)

Extend the current restriction on employment negotiations by senior government officials to the Executive Branch (May weaken existing law)

Extend the current prohibition on attempting to influence private hiring decisions on the basis of political affiliations to the Executive Branch (True)

Ensuring the prohibitions on using nonpublic information for private profit extends to all Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branch officers and employees (False, in Senate bill)

Delete provision that would require those who peddle political intelligence for profit to register and report

Eliminate the provision that gives law enforcement officials the tools they need to detect and prosecute public corruption added by the Senate and unanimously approved by House Judiciary Committee in December

Leader Cantor has put roadblock after roadblock up to slow this bill down, and it is now clear that the only way to heed the President’s call is to pass Cantor’s bill so we can get a conference committee where Democrats will strengthen the final legislation.

Posted in Correcting the Record, What's Happening | Leave a comment

For 400 days, Republicans have failed to offer a jobs agenda, voted to end the Medicare guarantee, and are once again threatening the payroll tax cut for middle class. 

Democrats have a different path. Democrats remain focused on our immediate priorities:

  • Extending the payroll tax cut for 160 million Americans,
  • Extending unemployment benefits for the millions of Americans who lost their jobs through no fault of their own,
  • Ensuring tens of millions of seniors can continue to see the doctor of their choice under Medicare.

Democrats are committed to reigniting the American Dream and rebuilding the pillars of America that have made our economy strong: small businesses, entrepreneurs, and an all-inclusive and thriving middle class.

By the Numbers: GOP Do-Nothing No Jobs Agenda

400: Days Republicans have been in charge

0: GOP jobs agendas

2 million
: Jobs potentially destroyed under GOP bills

31: Times House GOP have voted against taking up Democratic jobs legislation, including China currency legislation that would help create 1 million American jobs

3: Times House GOP have voted to end the Medicare guarantee and protect tax breaks for Big Oil, millionaires and corporations shipping jobs overseas

8: Times House GOP voted against urgent consideration of an extension of the payroll tax cut for 160 million Americans, including a bipartisan Senate compromise in December

229
: Number of House Republicans that voted to reject the bipartisan Senate compromise, risking a $1,000 tax hike for the typical American family and jeopardizing 600,000 American jobs by sending it to a non- existent conference committee to die

14: Times GOP have voted against the President’s American Jobs Act, or part of it

1.9 million
: Number of jobs that the President’s American Jobs Act is estimated to create

5: Times House GOP have brought our nation to the brink, creating economic uncertainty

1
: Number of jobs bills from the President enacted, due to Democratic pressure

Republicans Say NO as Democrats Fight to Create Jobs and Strengthen the Economy

Republicans have voted at least 31 times against Democratic proposals or efforts to consider proposals – several of which are bipartisan – to create or protect American jobs.  Republicans rejected urgent consideration of an extension of the payroll tax cut needed to stop a tax increase on 160 million working Americans and  efforts to discourage corporations from shipping American jobs overseas – and voted NO on taking up:  critical Make It In America initiatives, proposals to rebuild America, plans to strengthen American innovation, and efforts to level the playing field with China.  These include:

  • An American jobs effort to end government contracts rewarding corporations that ship American jobs overseas.  [Vote 19]
  • A measure to discourage outsourcing by denying the bill’s pro-corporation election rules for companies that ship American jobs overseas and leveling the playing field for workers in union elections. [Vote 868]
  • A measure that places a priority on keeping jobs in America, protecting the authority of the National Labor Relations Board to order an employer to maintain or restore jobs in the U.S. that would be otherwise outsourced to a foreign country. [Vote 710]
  • Build America Bonds to Create Jobs Now Act – leveraging public dollars to strengthen the private sector, growing our economy by rebuilding America’s schools, hospitals, and transit projects, supported by American businesses, the construction industry, mayors and governors. [Vote 38, Vote 30, Vote 189
  • American Jobs Matter Act – to give preference in federal contracts to U.S. manufacturers that create jobs here at home. [Vote 257]
  • National Manufacturing Strategy Act, to demand a clear plan to help manufacturers compete, invest in innovation, and put Americans back to work, which passed the House in 2010 with overwhelming bipartisan support. [Vote 279, Vote 721]
  • A measure to promote jobs and innovation at home, by prioritizing patent applications from entities that pledge to develop or manufacture their products and technologies in the United States. [Vote 490]
  • Advanced Vehicle Manufacturing Technology Act to help ensure the cars of the future are built here in the U.S., by investing in a broad range of near-term and long-term vehicle technologies to improve fuel efficiency, support domestic research and manufacturing, and lead to greater consumer choice of vehicle technologies and fuels. [Vote 310]
  • A measure to support American Manufacturers by giving priority to any company that uses materials made in America for the construction and renovation of school facilities. [Vote 693]
  • A measure to protect at least 10,000 American manufacturing jobs and provide disaster relief to families and business owners: approving bipartisan disaster aid passed by the Senate without slashing Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing loans that put people to work producing cleaner cars and investing in innovation. [Vote 715]
  • Currency Reform for Fair Trade Act to provide our government with effective tools to address unfair currency manipulation by countries like China, which could help create 1 million American manufacturing jobs by leveling the international playing field for American workers and businesses. [Vote 9, Vote 199, Vote 780, Vote 821, Vote 854] This bipartisan bill has 230 co-sponsors including 63 Republicans, yet the Republican leadership has blocked it.  Democrats have launched a process to force consideration of the measure; that petition has 178 of the 218 signatures needed.
  • A measure to ensure that American materials, rather than those imported from abroad, are used in the construction of new or existing structures for coal ash storage.  [Vote 792]
  • A Make It In America measure that prohibits the Coast Guard from purchasing textiles or apparel that are not grown, reprocessed, reused, or produced in the United States. [Vote 829]
  • A measure requiring a vote on extending the payroll tax cut and unemployment insurance before December 16, 2011. [Vote 870, Vote 889, Vote 902]
  • A measure extending and expanding the payroll tax cut, unemployment insurance, and ensuring that seniors still get to see the doctor of their choice, paid for by asking 300,000 people making more than $1 million a year to pay their fair share.[ Vote 918, Vote 925]
  • A measure expanding the payroll tax cut for 160 million Americans with a typical family getting a $1,500 tax cut, paid for by asking 300,000 people making more than $1 million a year to pay their fair share, while preventing insider trading by Members of Congress by enacting the STOCK Act. [Vote 922]
  • The bipartisan Senate agreement extending the payroll tax cut for 160 million Americans to avoid an imminent $1,000 tax increase for the typical family. [Vote 944, Vote 948]
  • A measure for middle class families, directing the Joint Committee on Deficit Reduction to eliminate subsidies for the five largest oil and gas companies and corporate jet owners, before gutting education initiatives that create jobs, spur growth, and invest in our future.  [Vote 676]
  • A measure to protect jobs for returning veterans by preventing incentives for small businesses to hire returning veterans from being swept away by GOP deregulatory efforts. [Vote 879]
  • A measure to allow Congress to make job-creating investments, instead of automatically freezing funding for Pell Grants and education programs for students, job benefits for veterans and job training for all Americans, and life-saving health research. [Vote 31]

Time and Again, Republicans through their Brinkmanship have Manufactured Crises, Creating Economic Uncertainty

  • Middle Class Tax Increase – At the end of 2011, House Republicans brought us to the brink of a tax increase on 160 million working Americans – even voting against a strongly bipartisan Senate compromise – only finally agreeing with the tax hike 8 days away. 
  • Manufacturing a Default Crisis – Throughout the summer, Republicans in Washington engaged in brinksmanship with the debt limit in order to insist upon a far-right ideological agenda.  This weakened our economy and led to Standard and Poor’s downgrading the U.S. credit rating of the United States from AAA to AA+.  S&P highlighted, “The political brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as America’s governance and policymaking becoming less stable…. The statutory debt ceiling and the threat of default have become political bargaining chips.”  There was only one political party that was using the debt ceiling as a bargaining chip.  Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said, “The negotiations that took place over the summer disrupted financial markets and probably the economy as well.” [August 26]
  • Destroying American Jobs/Playing Politics with Disaster Relief – In September, Republicans passed legislation that held essential disaster relief hostage, insisting on cuts that would have cost 10,000 good-paying American jobs by slashing Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing loans to produce cleaner American cars – a cut opposed by both the Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers.
  • FAA Shutdown – Republican intransigence resulted in a 13-day shutdown of the Federal Aviation Administration that furloughed tens of thousands of construction workers and thousands of federal employees. House Republicans refused to reauthorize the FAA without including an anti-union provision that would make it harder for workers at airlines and railroads to unionize. Airline inspectors were forced to work without pay during the shutdown.
  • CR – Republicans played politics last spring with the government funding bill – threatening a government shutdown that according to analysts at Goldman Sachs “could shave 0.2 percent off the growth of Gross Domestic Product for every week it continued.”  Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers (R-KY) stated “Our economy can’t handle the instability that comes from the threat of a government shutdown.”
Posted in Labor and American Jobs, What's Happening | Leave a comment

This afternoon, Congresswoman Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR) was sworn in:

Rep. Bonamici was elected January 31, 2012 in special election to fill the 1st District seat of Oregon. Rep. Bonamici brings the House to 434 Members (192 Democrats and 242 Republicans), 5 Delegates, and 1 Resident Commissioner with one vacancy remaining (AZ-8).

Posted in What's Happening | Leave a comment

To: Interested Parties
Fr: Democratic Leader’s Press Office
Dt: February 3, 2012
Re: ‘No Jobs’ GOP’s Week in Review

Republicans, who refused to produce a jobs agenda for more than a year, only found doom and gloom in today’s jobs report.  Yet they spent the whole week focusing on anything but jobs:

Doubling Down on Pledge to End the Medicare Guarantee (Conveniently followed by a vote to hide the impact GOP bills have on Medicare & Social Security)   

[Republicans] touted the fact that next month they plan to once again pass a budget that would drastically cut spending and transform Medicare. [The Hill, 2/1]

Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan: “We’re not backing off of any of our ideas…” [Fox News Sunday, 1/29]

Unveiling Another Gift to Big Oil in a Train Wreck of a Transportation Bill that Jeopardizes Jobs

“This is the most partisan transportation bill that I have ever seen,” [Transportation Secretary Ray] LaHood said in an exclusive interview with POLITICO.  [Politico, 2/2]

Risking a Tax Hike on 160 Million Americans by Bogging Down Payroll Cut Conference Committee Negotiations

“We have 27 days before our authority expires,” said Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-Calif.). But “we’re down to about 13 days of actual work to be done before the clock runs out … I urge us to refocus.”

Rep. Dave Camp (R-Mich.), who is chairing the panel, has made it repeatedly clear that he wanted conferees to negotiate policy matters first before tackling the sticky matter of how to pay for it…

For instance, both Senate and House Republicans are insistent that the final package roll back boiler regulations…[Politico, 2/2]

Getting a Message Makeover (again) and Thinking “Small”

Unpopular and divided, the once mighty House Republicans are laboring to repair their image and frame a new agenda…

But attracting positive attention while avoiding confrontation is proving to be a challenge in an election year, particularly for a group that in 2011 seemed to relish showdown after showdown.

Members are still struggling to sing from the same legislative hymnal…

Small, for now, may be best, Republicans say. [New York Times, 2/3]   

Quelling “Interoffice Tensions”

The top aides to House Majority Leader Eric Cantor and Speaker John Boehner are now seeking a truce after a bitter year of behind-the-scenes fighting that pitted the top House Republicans against one another…

The interoffice tensions were so prominent that elected Republican lawmakers were chafing at the public and private tribulations of the ongoing Boehner-Cantor drama…[Politico, 2/1]

Reprimanding Those Actually Focusing on Job Creation

Congressional Republicans criticized the Federal Reserve on Thursday for working to reduce unemployment and revive the housing market rather than maintaining a single-minded focus on inflation. [New York Times, 2/3]

When Republicans head home this weekend, let’s hope they listen to their constituents—who over and over again have called for action on jobs—and come back next week ready to get to work putting the country to work. 

Posted in In the News, What's Happening | Leave a comment

Today the Department of Labor announced that the economy added 243,000 jobs in January and the unemployment rate fell to 8.3 percent:

January 2012 Jobs Report Chart

With 257,000 jobs added by private businesses, this marks the 23rd consecutive month of private sector job growth:

January 2012 Private Sector Jobs Chart

In addition, the manufacturing sector added 50,000 jobs:

January Jobs Report - Manufacturing Jobs Chart

Leader Pelosi on today’s report:

Today’s jobs numbers are a clear sign that progress is being made, but now is not the time to take the pressure off in our work to create jobs. The middle class can’t afford another year of a Republican ‘do nothing’ Congress.

Our immediate priority is to extend the payroll tax cut so that 160 million Americans don’t face a tax hike and extend unemployment insurance to help those who lost their jobs through no fault of their own.

House Democrats want to reignite the American Dream, rebuilding the pillars of America that have made our economy strong: small businesses, entrepreneurs, and an all-inclusive and thriving middle class. It’s time for Republicans to join Democrats in getting the job done on behalf of the American people.

Posted in Labor and American Jobs, Leader Pelosi | Leave a comment

Medicare and Social Security are bedrock promises we have made to our seniors but Republicans appear to be determined to end the Medicare guarantee for seniors and increase their health care costs. Last year, House Republicans voted to end the Medicare guarantee, three times [Vote 277, Vote 382, Vote 606]–House Democrats said no. But it looks like Republicans are ready to try again: Chairman Ryan (and even Speaker Boehner) reiterated their support for the Republican budget plan that ends the Medicare guarantee:

ABC News – GOP Budget Guru Stands His Ground on Controversial Medicare Reform

ThinkProgress – Boehner Promises To Revisit Medicare Privatization In This Year’s Budget

Seniors, and all Americans, deserve to know what is happening to Medicare and Social Security. To that end, House Democrats offered a very simple motion to recommit this afternoon to require that the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) prepare reports on the impact of significant legislation on Medicare benefits and the Medicare and Social Security trust funds:

MOTION TO RECOMMIT H.R. 3582 WITH AN INSTRUCTION OFFERED BY MR. BOSWELL

Mr. Boswell moves to recommit the bill H.R.3582 to the Committee on the Budget with instructions to report the same back to the House forthwith with the following amendment:

After section 407(b) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 as added by section 2, insert the following new subsection (c) (and redesignate succeeding subsections accordingly):

1 ‘‘(c) IMPACTS ON MEDICARE BENEFITS, BENEFICIARIES, THE SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE TRUST FUNDS.—The Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall prepare for each major bill or resolution reported by any committee of the House of Representatives or the Senate (except the Committee on Appropriations of each House), as a supplement to estimates prepared under section 402, an impact analysis of the budgetary effects of such bill or resolution on Medicare benefits, beneficiaries, the Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds for the ten fiscal year period beginning with the first fiscal year for which an estimate was prepared under section 402 and each of the next three ten fiscal-year periods. The Director shall submit to such committee the impact analysis, together with the basis for the analysis. As a supplement to estimates prepared under section 402, all such information so submitted shall be included in the report accompanying such bill or resolution.’’.

237 House Republicans voted against this simple motion, and against Americans knowing how legislation would impact their retirement security. All House Democrats voted in favor.

Posted in Affordable Health Care, Consumer Protections, Retirement Security, What's Happening | Leave a comment